Questions and Our Answers
Iglesia Ni Cristo ― Answers
Letters with the sender’s complete name and address may be sent to:
Letters, GOD’S MESSAGE
Iglesia Ni Cristo Central Office, No. 1 Central Avenue, New Era, Quezon City 1107 Philippines.
Fax No. (632) 922-5749
E-mail to: pasugo@inc.org.ph
(The sender’s name may be withheld upon request).
We reserve the right to edit letters for reasons of space and clarity.
GOD’S MESSAGE Editorial Offices:
United States of America:
1617 Southgate Avenue, Daly City, California 94015 USA
Australia:
#3 Ross Street, Parramatta, NSW 2151 Australia
Fax No. (02) 9890-9633
Europe:
Via Ceresole Reale #9, Rome, Italy 00166
Fax No. (3906) 624-1914
Why REB Translation of John 10:9?
God is spirit
Judgment through the scriptural law
Baseless claim?
Peter himself says it is Jesus Christ
A FRIEND OF MINE gave me a copy PASUGO of (God’s Message) and I came across the article, written by Johnny J. Martin, entitled “Apostle Peter Is Not the Foundation Stone” (January-February, 1990).
1. In John 1:35-42, Jesus changed the name of Apostle Peter to Cephas, which is translated, a stone. Both Cephas (Aramaic) and Peter (Greek) mean the same.
2. Peter’s name was changed to Cephas, because he was later to be given a special role. This was done in the same way when God changed Abram’s name to Abraham, and Saul to Paul. The name change indicated that the person was chosen for a divine mission.
3. In Matthew 16:18, Jesus said to Peter (rock) that, “Thou art Peter (rock) and upon this rock I will build My Church…” Who is the rock being referred to? Don’t distort the truth, otherwise you will be branded as a false preacher.
4. In his conclusion, Mr. Martin stated, thus: “Therefore, our Lord Jesus Christ, Apostle Peter, and Apostle Paul are completely united in their teaching that Jesus Christ is the foundation stone of the true Church, not Apostle Peter.” But in Ephesians 2:20, it is stated that God’s household is “built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone.” If Mr. Martin is still ignorant about these two simple yet different terms — cornerstone and foundation — how can he ever hope to understand the mystery of salvation?
Is the Bible the only gospel of salvation?
Is the Bible incomplete?
Did he combine doctrines?
Reach Out
